Media Bias
I typically start my day with a review of Google News because it's a decent aggregator of news from a variety of sources. My favorite mobile app for news is Ground News. For $10 a year they serve up the latest headlines while also showing you which news outlets are more (or less) biased. For a little more, they'll provide even richer data and allow you to customize your news feed and topics to avoid bias. They also do a great job of highlighting "blind spots" on both ends of the spectrum - topics that news outlets leaning right or left don't cover.
This concept also extends to fact checking. In Trump world, fact checking is the shadiest of media practices, because it directly undermines the Dear Leader's narrative. Anyone who watched the VP debate saw Vance's visceral reaction to Norah O'Donnell fact-checking him live during the debate. Dude was so pissed his eye-liner started running a bit. Then he said the quiet part out loud: "I thought the rules were no fact-checking?!" Why on earth would anyone oppose fact-checking? Oh, right, because they plan to lie a lot and fact-checking is super frustrating when lying is a key part of your message.
And now, after the Trump base totally embraced his notion that Hatian immigrants are eating pets, they've moved on to embracing his lies about hurricane relief. The entire fact-checking section of my news feed this morning was about combating the lies that FEMA is handing all its money to immigrants (lie) or they're only giving $750 to victims (also a lie). I think I'm most frustrated that the media spends any time fact checking Trump because it's a waste of digital space. Those of us who have critical thinking cells know he's lying, and his followers don't care that he's lying. Maybe fact check some other politicians, if it comes from Trump or Vance at this point we can just assume it's a steaming pile of BS.
Comments
Post a Comment